Showing posts with label Henry IV. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Henry IV. Show all posts

Thursday, March 25, 2010

Henry VI Part 1: Fathers, Sons and Soccer Practice

There’s a story my dad used to love to tell. He coached my first soccer team when I was six years-old. In the middle of a game the ball rolled up to me and I kicked it as hard as I could. It went sailing into the air and down the field, over other kids’ heads. I ran straight to the sidelines and said: “Dad! Did you see THAT?!”

When we were young it was impossible to go to a place in Kenosha where my dad was unrecognized. The grocery store, restaurants, the gas station, if we all went as a family to the high school track to run around or hit tennis balls off the backboard there was always some adult I’d never met who would say: “Hey, Ernie!” and my dad would say, hey Rick or Mike or Rusty or Booker. He was a firefighter and a softball player and such accomplishments are enough to cement a father’s heroism in his young son’s hopeful mind.

George Bush and George W. Will Smith and Jayden Smith. Henry V and Henry VI. Fathers often cast long shadows from which their sons struggle to escape. Check out this eulogizing by the Duke of Gloucester to the late great Henry V that opens Henry VI Part 1:


England ne’er had a king until his time.

Virtue he had, deserving to command;

His brandished sword did blind men with his beams;

His arms spread wider than dragon’s wings;

His sparkling eyes, replete with wrathful fire,

More dazzled and drove back his enemies

Than midday sun fierce bent against their faces.

What should I say? His deeds excel all speech.

He ne’er lift up his hand but conqueréd. (1:1)


A mere 20 lines later, Gloucester describes the young Henry VI: “an effeminate prince whom like a schoolboy you may overawe.” (1:1) Granted, Joan of Arc is one of the major characters in this play, so describing someone as effeminate might not carry the same derogatory meaning that such knights normally ascribe to it, but it ain’t like he’s talking dragon’s wings about the heir to the throne.

Shortly into the play the French rebel, the houses of York and Lancaster argue and pluck red and white roses to start the War of the Roses, and the great military hero of England, Talbot, is abandoned in battle because of the civil discord.

Talbot is the scourge of the French. And while fighting Joan la Pucelle (of Arc) he and his son, John Talbot, are killed. They had been separated for 7 years by war, but Talbot called his son to the battle to teach him the family business:


O young John Talbot, I did send for thee

To tutor thee in stratagems of war (4:5)


When he sees that they are badly outnumbered, he tries to send his son away, but John refuses to fly:


Is my name Talbot? And am I your son?

And shall I fly? O, if you love my mother,

Dishonor not her honorable name

To make a bastard and a slave of me! (4:5)


Before Talbot dies, his son’s body is brought to him:


And in that sea of blood, my boy did drench

His over-mounting spirit; and there died

My Icarus, my blossom, in his pride. (4:7)


Icarus is, of course, the average son of Daedalus from Greek mythology. They flew on waxen wings to escape Crete and foolish Icarus flew too close to the sun and fell into the sea where he drowned. A cautious tale of venturing from beneath your father’s shadow.

But there are also accounts within this play of the sons who outdo their fathers. Standing watch at Orleance is the Master Gunner, who leaves his son on the watch in his stead. And when the opportunity arises, the son fires on Talbot and Salisbury, and he kills Salisbury.

Later on in the battle of Roan, the dying Duke of Bedford mentions Pendragon:


Not to be gone from hence, for once I read

That stout Pendragon, in his litter sick,

Came to the field and vanquishéd his foes. (3:2)


If you don’t know who Pendragon is, that’s okay. It’s only really important that you know that his son was King Arthur. Another son who outshone his father.

The opportunity is there, but Henry VI’s cards have been dealt. The evil of the early imagery of the play bodes poorly for the young king. “Hung be the heavens with black, yield day to night!” (1:1) Day and night, like York and Lancaster, the warring factions of heaven.

What’s interesting is that this trio of plays was written before Henry IV parts 1 and 2 and Henry V. So, it's possible that for the audiences attending Henry VI that the legend of Henry V is as perfect in their minds as Richard the Lionheart and King Arthur. His father was not a human. He was a myth, a folk hero. A giant among kings.

Eventually, Shakespeare humanizes Henry V in those other histories. He shows his flirtations with criminals and drunkards in Henry IV parts 1 and 2. And even in Henry V after he conquers France, there’s the courtship of Catherine, when he bumbles through the French language in declaring his poor, soldier's love. It’s important that the legend of the father dissolve so that the son may achieve a unique success in life.

For my part, my father was humanized to me in two parts. The first of which relates to soccer.

My dad coached a soccer team with another woman before my parents got divorced. I was in college and I would sometimes come to practices and run little clinics on heading or shooting. There was a moment I observed between my dad and this woman when we were working on trapping. He was throwing the ball to her and she was trapping it while sixteen nine year-old girls ran around doing the same thing. Amidst all that giggling and the flying soccer balls. I saw my dad throwing the ball… but it wasn’t like watching my dad. It was like watching me. He was awkward and stumbling exactly the way I was around a girl I like, having no idea what to do. It was chemistry. I saw that connection and felt pangs of confusion. A strong want to combat the momentum of events. But I'm a midwestern boy, and despite my mother, I buried that confusion. Cause we hope ignoring such things makes them go away. But they don't. Eventually my parents got divorced and this woman became my stepmom.

My dad became a person entirely in my eyes soon after my parents were divorced. One day he had this weary look on his face. There was some superficial stressful thing that froze him for a moment. And he rubbed his eyes and scratched his head with both hands and said, “I don’t know. I don’t know what I’m doing.” He wasn't really saying it to me. And he wasn't really saying it about this stressful thing that had happened. He was saying it about everything in the world. 

You can forgive a person for almost anything when they admit that. Because even though they don't know what they're doing, at least they're trying.

Fathers can overreach. They wrongfully conquer sovereign nations and leave the mess to their sons. They fall in love with other women. They believe they can fly. Sometimes their sons suffer for it. But sometimes they do the right thing and sacrifice their mythological legacy for mere humanity, and it's okay. We're still going to run to them on the sidelines after we send that ball flying through the air. They're still our fathers, even if they’re only men.

Friday, December 4, 2009

Swords and Beer or How to be King of England


I played college soccer and at the end of every season we would celebrate the months of hard work and physical discipline by having a progressive. You are probably familiar with this type of party.
This is where all the men's soccer players get together and go from one player’s room to the next, drinking a different drink in each room -- staying just long enough to sing “Tubthumping” by Chumbawumba -- until finally meeting up with the women’s soccer team at a raging party where red plastic cups of Grainbelt Premium spill onto the warped hardwood floors of some notorious student house a few blocks from campus and the camaraderie of the season crescendos in dancing and vomit.
Unfortunately, when I was in college I didn’t drink.
Not a single goddamn drop.
So, when I went to meet the team in the first room and said I didn’t want a drink, the German captain of our team inquired: “Where are you? In college or in church?”
Everyone laughed and sang together: “I GET KNOCKED DOWN, BUT I GET UP AGAIN, YOU’RE NEVER GONNA KEEP ME DOWN!”
It was all good-natured, but somehow in my naive, self-conscious mind my sobriety was an insurmountable barrier to true fellowship with my teammates.
This, combined with my inability to use a sword, is how I knew I would never make a decent King of England.
According to Henry IV: Part One the most important characteristics for a King of England to possess are the ability to drink beer with the common folk and use a sword.
In the second half of the play Prince Harry returns to help his father fight off the rebelling Percy family, and he apologizes for his wantonness and prodigal absence:

So please your majesty, I would I could
Quit all offences with as clear excuse
As well as I am doubtless I can purge
Myself of many I am charged withal. (3:2)

And later:

I shall hereafter, my thrice-gracious lord,
Be more myself. (3:2)

But the King doesn’t fully accept his apology until they’re on the battlefield and the King is losing his fight to Douglas the Scot. Prince Harry comes in to rescue him and drive Douglas away with a strong showing of swordsmanship. And the King says:

Thou hast redeemed thy lost opinion
And showed thou mak’st some tender of my life
In this fair rescue thou hast brought to me. (5:4)

Despite his truant years, the King reinstates an honorable opinion of his son because of his ability to wield a sword.
And we already know that the Prince is an affluent consumer of grog.

To conclude, I am so good a proficient in one quarter of an hour that I can drink with any tinker in his own language during my life. (2:4)

Convincing? Obviously. But wait, wait, there's more!
This isn’t the only story where we see these are the essential qualities of an English Monarch. There’s another King whose only success came with the drinking of beer and the wielding of weapons.
Of course, I’m speaking of King Ralph.
Ralph is a Vegas lounge singer, who becomes king when the entire royal family is electrocuted during a family photo shoot. He is an American alky with an affinity for strip clubs, so you would think he’d make a lousy King and you’d be wrong.
His blue-collar ways put off some stick-up-their-ass European nobility, but it isn’t long before King Ralph meets up with King Mulambon of Zambezi. They drink beer and throw darts, and afterward, King Mulambon shows Ralph the way they throw darts in his country: chucking spears at targets.
Spear-chucking is not quite swordsmanship, but for the purposes of this absurdly academic essay, it’s close enough. Eventually, Ralph steps down and lets Peter O’Toole take over as King, but not before he uses his bonding session with King Mulambon to create thousands of British jobs! Huzzah!
With such overwhelming evidence from two masterworks of English royal history, it’s no wonder that I wandered away from my soccer-playing comrades the night of the progressive. They marched into the brisk, autumnal night chanting one of Macalester’s many fine soccer cheers. While I trudged dormward, my hands in my pockets, all hope of kinship with the Windsors severed, bound for the white cinderblock room where my friends Bill and Mark and Brett were no doubt watching Twin Peaks and talking about Star Wars, instead of to the sexy, youthful enterprises of the other soccer players whose inebriation and swordsmanship gave them leave to dream a little longer of Buckingham.

Wednesday, December 2, 2009

Two Wrongs and Some Ass-Kicking

When I was 10 I was in A Christmas Carol at the Lakeside Players in Kenosha Wisconsin, playing the pivotal role of Boy 2. There was this other kid who played a character named Dick. One day Andy Becker, who played Young Ebenezer, overheard the kid who played Dick calling me gay because my name is Gabe and it sounds like gay which ten year-old boys think is funny.

So I said to Andy, "I guess you are what your name is in the play." Which didn't seem like a very good comeback to me, I mean I wanted to just call the kid a dick, but that was one of those words that if my dad heard me say he would get inexplicably mad and exhale impatiently.

Anyway, I guess the kid who played Dick heard what I'd said and I always felt really bad. Especially on the day when I found out that once our scenes were over he was playing GI Joe's in the old theater and I loved GI Joe's. We could have hung out and become friends, but instead he never auditioned for any of the other Christmas plays at Lakeside again and who knows what the hell happened to him. Maybe he died.

My point is that two wrongs don't make a right.

Take Henry IV for instance. Henry IV became king by rebelling against Richard II in the play that came before this one, Richard II. Now his old allies, the Percy's, want to overthrow him to restore order and justice to England. Do two treasons make a right?

Meanwhile, Prince Harry/Hal/Henry is gallivanting about Eastcheap with thieves and ruffians, the foremost of whom is Sir John Falstaff. Harry is convinced to partake in a robbery when his buddy Ned tells him that they're going to play a trick on Falstaff. They're going to let Falstaff commit the robbery, and then they'll put on disguises and rob Falstaff. Do two robberies make a right? What does Prince Harry think? Let's take a closer look, shall we?

Harry’s speech in act 1 scene 2 is open to some interpretation. The text has Harry claiming that he associates with Falstaff and these rapscallions because he wants to lower people's expectations for him and then he is going to make a grand entrance onto the political scene and be praised because of his previously perceived lack of kingly acumen.


Yet herein will I imitate the sun,

Who doth permit the base contagious clouds

To smother up his beauty from the world,

That, when he please again to be himself,

Being wanted, he may be more wondered at

By breaking through the foul and ugly mists

Of vapours that did seem to strangle him. (1:2)


This lowering of expectations is a political move a son of America recently executed to disturbing presidential effect. But Shakespeare is a master of human nature, and I don’t buy this for a second. I think The Prince is just rationalizing.

We all do it. I can't tell you how many times I claimed that working as a concessionist at the Har Mar movie theater after graduating college was me "researching" life in order to be a better writer. Really I was just getting free movies and hanging out with high school students, who were pretty easy to fool into thinking that I was cool.

If I were Prince Harry and my father had overthrown the King and had him killed, I would hate him for making me heir apparent to a treasonous villain. I would be the target of vengeance as much as him. Who do you side with in this scenario? You can’t undermine your father and king, and you can’t stand with him since his claim to the throne is hardly just.

So you do nothing. You drink. You hang out with Falstaff. And you make excuses for yourself. You pretend to be better than them, when you're actually worse, because you're hiding from your true responsibilities. Just like Aragorn in The Lord of the Rings. Rangering around when you should be leading men. Luckily for Aragorn a great event happened that thrust him into battle.

Prince Harry has a similar stroke of fortune. The rebellion against his father begins. And Harry knows it’s his chance. Instantly, he begins his high-fallutin' moralistic ways and decides that two wrongs don't make a right. He says that he's going to return the money that he and Falstaff stole. ("The money shall be paid back again with advantage." [2:4]) And he puts down Falstaff something fierce when they do a little roleplay: "That villainous, abominable misleader of youth, Falstaff, that old white-bearded Satan." (2:4) In context, these insults are somewhat playful, since Falstaff puts down himself in the same scene, but they're still pretty harsh things to say about a friend.

But what if the call from his father never came? What if Hotspur (Percy) never grew upset with the King and decided to rebel, but rather was all valor and loyalty? Then the King would have accepted him in his son’s place as he wishes he could in the first scene:

O, that it could be proved

That some night-tripping fairy had exchanged

In cradle clothes our children where they lay,

And called mine ‘Percy’, his ‘Plantagenet’;

Then would I have his Harry, and he mine. (1:1)

(Plantagenet is the King's surname.)

This would leave Prince Harry in the taverns of Eastcheap, drinking, and socializing. Waiting for the call from his father. Waiting for the crisis, the opportunity to prove his heroism and put his so-called brilliant political plot into action. Waiting forever.

But Harry does get the call from his old man. And he sees that two treasons won't make a right, and two robberies won't either. It's the new act -- returning the money -- that makes a right. Only right makes right. And in the case of the rebellion coming in the next few acts of this play, I'm pretty sure right is gonna be some serious ass-kicking.

Saturday, November 28, 2009

Wrong Turn at Albuquerque


Dear Mr. Fornshell,

            I’m sorry I’m a little behind on my reading, but last weekend I had to drive to Truth or Consequences, New Mexico to rescue my brother, Ian, who got stranded there by German Buddhists.

            Minutes after I made my last post I called Ian because there had been a rumor circulating that he was going to be in the greater Southwestern United States area. The conversation went something like this:

            “Ian, I heard you were in Arizona.”

            “No. I’m in Truth or Consequences, New Mexico.”

            “What the hell are you doing in Truth or Consequences, New Mexico?”

            “…I’m kind of stranded.”

            Pause.

            “Do you need me to come pick you up?”

            “No. No. That’s ridiculous, it's like a quarter of the way across the country. I’ll be fine. I’m just going to get a ride up to Albuquerque and catch a plane to Chicago.”

            “Get a ride” meant hitchhike. I didn’t have any doubts that he would be able to handle himself. Ian used to be in the army and he’s a Buddhist. He’s my big brother so naturally I see him as indestructible. I told him that he should call me if he decided he wanted me to come pick him up. I mean, he would do the same for me.

            In May 2001 I was driving across Wisconsin in my old Plymouth Sundance. It was filled with all of my belongings because I was moving from Kenosha back to St. Paul, MN. After I finished college I moved home to Kenosha thinking there might be jobs there and that I could be close to my family. 

           The economy tanked, Bush beat Gore. I worked as a crappy high school soccer coach, a third shift hospital security guard and a substitute teacher. Not really a banner year in my life. My new plan was to spend the summer shooting a documentary with some friends about Minnesota small town festivals.

I left late that night because I had to stop in Racine to see WWF superstar Mick Foley who was signing copies of his new book Foley is Good, the second part of his memoir trilogy. Foley is Good was a piece of shit. But Mick’s first book, Have a Nice Day: A Tale of Blood and Sweatsocks, is amazing. It was famously written out in 800 pages of adrenaline-infused longhand. He was inspired to write it after almost being killed in the legendary Hell in the Cell match. He knew he needed to find some way to support his family that didn’t involve getting choke-slammed through a chain link fence and falling thirty feet onto the floor covered in thumbtacks.

Ulysses S. Grant had a similar motivation for literary remembrance. His alcoholism had lost him all his money and instead of leaving his family in debt, he buckled down and wrote his memoirs, finishing just before he died. The book went on to be a huge hit, and kept his family from ever having to work a day in their lives.

A pair of American heroes.

            Because of my celebrity stopover in Racine, I was very late getting on the road. It was around ten when I stopped in Tomah to eat a Butterburger and crinkle fries and the engine trouble began. I made it only two exits farther to the Jellystone Park Campgrounds in Warrens, WI. There the car died and I was stranded in the parking lot.

            This was 2001 and I didn’t own a cell phone, so I called my dad from the payphone in the park and told him what happened. He said he’d pick up Ian and be right there.

            The people who worked at the park were incredibly hospitable. There was a kid, must have been about 16 and an older guy and girl who I think were a couple. We played a little air hockey and watched Remember the Titans in the Yogi Bear Lodge. At around one in the morning I told them I’d be fine just waiting in the car. Not the first time I slept in that car, but it would prove to be the last.

Ian and my dad got there at around 3 am. We transferred all my junk from my car to the minivan, and drove on to St. Paul. Getting there right around 6. They helped me unpack, stopped at the Grandview Grill for some Kamikazee Pancakes and then turned around and drove back to Kenosha.

            This is one of those things we do in my family.

So, after Ian said he was going to be fine hitchhiking to Albuquerque, I filled up my car with gas and stopped at the library to check out some books on CD. (I did not check out any Shakespeare because you can’t take notes in the margins of an audiobook).

            I looked at the map and saw how far of a drive it was. 12 hours. It was 1:30pm on Saturday. I called Ian back and got there at 3:30 am. Crashed in his hotel room until 7, and we were back in LA by 8:30 Sunday night.

            As you can see, Mr. Fornshell. There’s just no way that I could have another post ready this week that says anything significant at all about Henry IV. I mean, I’ve started reading it. I don’t know why I started the histories with Henry IV instead of with King John, which is the first historically. Let’s just chalk it up to an irrepressible desire to get to know Falstaff, the fat knight, the witty coward, the comic relief in an epoch of turmoil and rebellion. We all need to take a break from the profound events of the real world and do something ridiculous once in a while. Don’t we?